Difference between revisions of "Various documentation"
From Kolmisoft Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
==What Linux distribution is best for MOR?== | ==What Linux distribution is best for MOR?== | ||
| Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
MOR can be installed on any Linux distribution, but some modifications to the scripts should be done before installing. | MOR can be installed on any Linux distribution, but some modifications to the scripts should be done before installing. | ||
<br> | |||
==How does MOR compares to A2Billing?== | |||
===Main advantages=== | |||
1. MOR uses native Asterisk application written in C, A2Billing uses PHP AGI. That's why MOR performance is much higher then A2Billing. Simply put - MOR runs faster. | |||
2. Compare interfaces and usage. MOR has nice clean human-friendly interface. | |||
3. Documentation for MOR is much more user friendly | |||
4. Complicated inner logic in A2Billing. Software is not enterprise client oriented. More for calling cards. | |||
===User's notes=== | |||
* Tried to use asterisk2billing, comparing with your product, asterisk2billing rich of feature but hard to be understood.That's my reason using MOR as another solution. (Dedi, www.clarisense.co.id, Indonesia) | |||
* [01:51:55] gregoruspl says: I try a2billing but it's very slowly, not voicemail and fax2mail | |||
Revision as of 09:37, 31 December 2007
What does MOR stands for?
At first it was MCC - Modified Calling Card (Application).
MOR stands for MCC on Rails (upgraded version).
What language is MOR written in?
- GUI - Ruby On Rails
- Asterisk Application - C
- It uses MySQL
What Linux distribution is best for MOR?
We have install scripts for Debian Etch, Centos 4/5 and Fedora.
MOR can be installed on any Linux distribution, but some modifications to the scripts should be done before installing.
How does MOR compares to A2Billing?
Main advantages
1. MOR uses native Asterisk application written in C, A2Billing uses PHP AGI. That's why MOR performance is much higher then A2Billing. Simply put - MOR runs faster.
2. Compare interfaces and usage. MOR has nice clean human-friendly interface.
3. Documentation for MOR is much more user friendly
4. Complicated inner logic in A2Billing. Software is not enterprise client oriented. More for calling cards.
User's notes
- Tried to use asterisk2billing, comparing with your product, asterisk2billing rich of feature but hard to be understood.That's my reason using MOR as another solution. (Dedi, www.clarisense.co.id, Indonesia)
- [01:51:55] gregoruspl says: I try a2billing but it's very slowly, not voicemail and fax2mail
